Eminent Domain Redefined

[TRX350_On_The_Rack]

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/23/scotus.property.ap/index.html

[gery350]

the rich get richer and the poor get thrown out.

[kawGIRL]

 

[TRX350_On_The_Rack]

This is even worse. First IBM and now Unocal.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/06/22/cnooc.unocal.reut/index.html

[PureLogic]

Don't look to far away. That stuff is going on right now in  our own back yards. As in here and all over Florida.

[gery350]

hey i got an idea. govt agrees for private to take from private. well hows this: private take from govt.
example: private take squares public land.


i know i am reaching but what the heck.
practice what you preach.

[ish]

the funny thing is that the dem judges were the majority ones that voted for this.

[TRX350_On_The_Rack]

Taking land for economic growth is B/S. I believe the Supreme Court wants the states to deal with this issue. Moderate Judges voting for this was shocking.

We know what issue is next for the Supreme Court, the big "A" and if that gets overturned then the sh*t is really going to hit the fan.

[Ida_Mann]

by their own arguments, private homeowners who want to build a house on public park land should be allowed to do so since it would create more tax money collected, and create a home for more people(taxpayers) to live.

maybe I should approach my new local government and ask about a permit to build a house in the middle of a local park.

Id@

[Lost Soul]

They're trying to do that right now in River Ranch.

The nature conservacy wants to take away peoples land for what they deem public use.


I suspect the founding fathers would be rolling over in their graves.

Government for the people? DEAD IDEAL

Government for bigger Government. ALIVE AND WELL.


GOVERNMENT CAN SEIZE YOUR ASSETS, AND YOU CAN'T DO A DAMN THING ABOUT IT! 

I guess we'll just have to live with it.

[bigscrub79]

We dont have to live with it we can stand up and fight.