mark my words: there will not be a war with China. Far too big of a conflict and there would be SUBSTANTIAL global intervention before it was allowed. But hey, we could always have bi-lateral talks between China, North Korea and the US while at the same time allowing China the freedom to deal with N. Korea on their own

didn't make sense when Kerry said it either.
What intervention, from whom? It would be the only two major powers in the world at war with one another, noone would step in the middle of that. North Korea's issues seem everything to do with us (demorocy) and nothing to do with China's communism rule. I wouldn't hold out hoping they are going to come to our rescue.
Um...Bill Clinton, February 1993. What did he do afterwards to thwart terrorism? He arrested 6 people, wiped his hands, brushed his shoulder and went on patting himself on the back...and what did he do after the attack on the US embassy in 1998 (august i think)? Bin Laden was held responsible but did we search and search? Nope. If we had, maybe 9/11 would be nothing more than a nightmare that we never had. That right there is quite frankly the reason I am RELIEVED we have a republican president in this time of crisis...one who knows hte importance of protection and one who has a patriotic flame that will never die.
What did Bush do to stop 9/11? My point being it's easy to bash someone after the fact. How many people will bash Bush if we get hit with another terroist attack after all the US lives have been lost? After all 9/11 was 10 years in the making.
the tax cuts were an attempt to jumpstart the economy. If you cut taxes for the wealthy (typically the business owners), that money gets recirculated down to the employee's, the company itself and advancements in the company. If you impose more taxes on big business, then you end up with decreased wages and tighter spending.
I know exactly what the tax cuts were suppose to do. The top 1% aren't buiness owners but rather CEO's of major corporations or the like. The tax cuts they took on thier income would have very little if any play on the employment situation. Now tax cuts for businesses I would agree with you on.
10 years is jack sh*t with SS...sorry but its true. We could have one huge orgy in the US and that 10 year surplus turns into a 2 year overdraft. Bottom line is SS sucks and it should be privately invested if they want to. The tax cut theory is irrelevant and would end up doing more harm than good. The conservative may look out for big business, but who do you think watches out for the little guys (employees).
I don't know who is watching out for us? We are the first to get laid off, the least likely to have excess savings if we are let go, and see the least benifit from income tax cuts. I've yet to see any president yet who has put any substantial money in my pocket.
Bush doesn't restore morality and values?? Gimme some of the sh*t you're smoking!!

I sure don't see him spending time with his family or embarcing american's to put family first. If family and moral values were high on his list you would see him talk more about it. Not that Clinton was a good role model for american citizens. He was real for the times but not a example of what a family man should be.
i agree with you 100% here. I love the southern lifestyle where everyone is friendly with everyone...and god do i miss it. SW Ranches is the closest thing down here and even that is a distant second to a majorly populated 'southern' city.
LOL at least we agree 100% on some level. It's alright though as americans we have the right to our opinion and not be critized for it. I certainly respect your opinion and hope you do mine.
Jeff