http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26892950/wid/11915773?GT1=31037
Quote from: big-daddy on September 26, 2008, 11:21:57 AM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26892950/wid/11915773?GT1=31037
I'll take vanilla..... ;)
That's ridiculous. Are they going to create jobs for pregnant women? Those people are nuts!!
Bring on the boooobies <nanaparty> <nanaparty> <nanaparty> <nanaparty> <nanaparty> :Fp :Fp :Fp :Fp :Fp :Fp :Fp :Fp :Fp
:drink.gif :drink.gif :drink.gif :drink.gif :drink.gif :drink.gif :drink.gif :drink.gif
I will take a tour of the farm ... :hotty2.gif :hotty2.gif :hotty2.gif
No, give ME the break! This is clearly designed to stimulate debate which will change the bountiful ignorance on the subject of breast-feeding children(vs. bottle-feeding). Far too many women selfishly make excuses for choosing to bottle-feed when they're perfectly and physically capable of breast-feeding. There's no question of the advantages of breast-feeding children!!!!! The criticism of breast-feeding probably comes from the very same folks who insist breasts are sex organs. Did Adam and Eve milk cows during their procreation of our species? And, while we're on that subject, if breasts were created by God for the procreation of our species, then isn't it an unnatural act for grown men to admire and touch them? That unnatural act argument is used by some in a vain attempt to support their personal discrimination of gays, right?
Let's all go to www.benjerry.com and suggest a flavor. I'll have the Cherry Boobie Garcia, Chocolate Chip Boobie Dough, Chunky Monkey Boobie Ice Cream, etc..
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 26, 2008, 01:16:41 PM
No, give ME the break! This is clearly designed to stimulate debate which will change the bountiful ignorance on the subject of breast-feeding children(vs. bottle-feeding). Far too many women selfishly make excuses for choosing to bottle-feed when they're perfectly and physically capable of breast-feeding. There's no question of the advantages of breast-feeding children!!!!! The criticism of breast-feeding probably comes from the very same folks who insist breasts are sex organs. Did Adam and Eve milk cows during their procreation of our species? And, while we're on that subject, if breasts were created by God for the procreation of our species, then isn't it an unnatural act for grown men to admire and touch them? That unnatural act argument is used by some in a vain attempt to support their personal discrimination of gays, right?
Huh? Where did that come from?? We're talking about ice cream.
Quote from: TRX450R_Racer on September 26, 2008, 01:33:44 PM
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 26, 2008, 01:16:41 PM
No, give ME the break! This is clearly designed to stimulate debate which will change the bountiful ignorance on the subject of breast-feeding children(vs. bottle-feeding). Far too many women selfishly make excuses for choosing to bottle-feed when they're perfectly and physically capable of breast-feeding. There's no question of the advantages of breast-feeding children!!!!! The criticism of breast-feeding probably comes from the very same folks who insist breasts are sex organs. Did Adam and Eve milk cows during their procreation of our species? And, while we're on that subject, if breasts were created by God for the procreation of our species, then isn't it an unnatural act for grown men to admire and touch them? That unnatural act argument is used by some in a vain attempt to support their personal discrimination of gays, right?
Huh? Where did that come from?? We're talking about ice cream.
Hhmmm............ I guest he want to use another type of milk for his ice cream? :dunno.gif
No, thanks on the Rainbow Garcia flavor there sir! Sorry to confuse you. Ashley Byrne, a campaign coordinator for PETA, acknowledged the implausibility of substituting breast milk for cow's milk, but said it's no stranger than humans consuming the milk of another species.
"We're aware this idea is somewhat absurd, and that putting it into practice is a stretch. At the time same, it's pretty absurd for us to be drinking the milk of cows," she said.
PETA's a minority who's obviously at the far end of the spectrum. NO ONE, including them, takes the proposed substitution seriously. But, breast-feeding was included in the article and that topic is taken seriously by millions of people.
What did he say? ???
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 26, 2008, 02:17:04 PM
No, thanks on the Rainbow Garcia flavor there sir! Sorry to confuse you. Ashley Byrne, a campaign coordinator for PETA, acknowledged the implausibility of substituting breast milk for cow's milk, but said it's no stranger than humans consuming the milk of another species.
"We're aware this idea is somewhat absurd, and that putting it into practice is a stretch. At the time same, it's pretty absurd for us to be drinking the milk of cows," she said.
PETA's a minority who's obviously at the far end of the spectrum. NO ONE, including them, takes the proposed substitution seriously. But, breast-feeding was included in the article and that topic is taken seriously by millions of people.
Quote from: AintSkeered on September 26, 2008, 01:16:41 PM
No, give ME the break! This is clearly designed to stimulate debate which will change the bountiful ignorance on the subject of breast-feeding children(vs. bottle-feeding). Far too many women selfishly make excuses for choosing to bottle-feed when they're perfectly and physically capable of breast-feeding. There's no question of the advantages of breast-feeding children!!!!! The criticism of breast-feeding probably comes from the very same folks who insist breasts are sex organs. Did Adam and Eve milk cows during their procreation of our species? And, while we're on that subject, if breasts were created by God for the procreation of our species, then isn't it an unnatural act for grown men to admire and touch them? That unnatural act argument is used by some in a vain attempt to support their personal discrimination of gays, right?
Adam and Eve....... Are you my 24thousand second brother. :R :R :R